Diversity and Inclusion Consultation

Both the FCA and PRA have issued a public consultation, to which you can respond, on the subject of introducing a regulatory framework for reporting of diversity and inclusion in firms (CP23/20). The FCA suggests that “greater levels of diversity and inclusion can improve outcomes for markets and consumers. In particular by helping reduce groupthink, supporting healthy work cultures, improving understanding of and provision for diverse consumer needs and unlocking diverse talent, supporting the competitiveness of the UK’s financial services sector”. But they provide no significant evidence of that.

What they are proposing is an obligation on larger organisations to provide masses of data on the sexual orientation, ethnic status, even religious adherence of employees.

Proposals set out for firms include requirements to:

  • Develop a diversity and inclusion strategy setting out how the firm will meet their objectives and goals.
  • Collect, report and disclose data against certain characteristics.
  • Set targets to address under-representation.

Will there be targets set in due course for the number of bisexual employees? What utter nonsense.

Basically it means a whole mass of new bureaucracy which I personally consider a complete waste of time. The FCA and PRA have more important matters to deal with. Even responding to these consultations I consider a waste of time so I will not do so. But if you have an urge to do so please go here: https://www.fca.org.uk/news/press-releases/fca-and-pra-propose-measures-boost-diversity-and-inclusion-financial-services

Roger Lawson (Twitter https://twitter.com/RogerWLawson  )

You can “follow” this blog by entering your email address in the box below.  You will then receive an email alerting you to new posts as they are added.

One thought on “Diversity and Inclusion Consultation”

  1. I couldn’t agree more. This trend for highly remunerated bureaucrats to pursue easy to apply woke policies is essentially discrimination and far from the positive change they claim in such subjective, vague, terms. If the arguments are valid the constant motivation for success will result in such policies being introduced. If not, they will do damage to the community as the dismal episode of Dame Alison Rose and NatWest have so clearly demonstrated.

Leave a Reply